Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Home
  2. Smart home devices

The Best Smart Water-Leak Detector

Updated
The D-Link Wi-Fi Water Leak Sensor and Alarm Starter Kit.
Photo: Michael Murtaugh

Water damage is one of the most common and costly causes of property damage. Smart water-leak detectors offer a way to discover a water-leak issue before it becomes a disaster. These puck-like devices can detect pooling water, trigger an alarm, and send you a smartphone notification. If you have an existing problem spot such as a drain that backs up or an aging water heater, or if you’re worried that your dishwasher or clothes washer will break down, a detector placed near the potential leak zone will ensure that you’re aware the moment something goes wrong and can take action.

The D-Link DCH-S1621KT Whole Home Smart Wi-Fi Water Leak Sensor Kit is the best water-leak detector we tested, due to its quick response time, effective alarm, varied options for detection (including a cable extension), and easy setup.

Everything we recommend

Our pick

This sensor provides best-in-class response times and thorough and versatile leak-detection options, but its smart-home support is limited.

Buying Options

Runner-up

This water-leak sensor responds quickly and is easy to set up, but it also requires buying a hub.

Buying Options

$24 $15 from Amazon

With clipped on-page coupon

Budget pick

Though this model has the fewest features, setup takes seconds, its performance is fast for a Wi-Fi–based detector, and it sports an alarm that hits fire-alarm-like volume levels.

What to know when buying


  • Drip detection

    Detectors work only if water touches them. Some rely on bottom-mounted probes to sense water, and some also have top-mounted probes that catch falling drips.

  • Smart coverage varies

    Many models integrate with smart-home platforms such as Amazon Alexa, Apple Home, and Google Home, but some can only send an email alert or push notification.

  • Don’t miss an alarm

    Some models have built-in alarms that blare out when they detect water, which gives you another level of protection in case of a leak.

  • Hubs may cost extra

    Some models require purchasing a hub, a small device that connects the sensor to your home Wi-Fi. These devices are typically compatible with other smart sensors and devices, too.

Our pick

This sensor provides best-in-class response times and thorough and versatile leak-detection options, but its smart-home support is limited.

Buying Options

Compatibility: Google Home, IFTTT

D-Link’s DCH-S1621KT Whole Home Smart Wi-Fi Water Leak Sensor Kit includes a standalone sensor puck and a 19-inch leak-sensing cable that together offer a wider leak-detection range in comparison with competitors. Although D-Link’s smart-home integration is minimal, this sensor kit’s speedy response times and impressive 83-decibel alarm make it the best bet for most people.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Runner-up

This water-leak sensor responds quickly and is easy to set up, but it also requires buying a hub.

Buying Options

$24 $15 from Amazon

With clipped on-page coupon

Compatibility: Amazon Alexa, IFTTT

YoLink’s Water Leak Sensor 4 was responsive during our testing, as it quickly detected leaks. It easily integrates into an existing Amazon Alexa or IFTTT setup, and the top- and bottom-mounted probes give you added leak coverage from potential dripping or burst pipes. YoLink requires you to purchase one of its smart hubs to connect its sensors to your home network, but they are reasonably priced; some hub models have a built-in speaker, or you can buy a hub in a bundle that also includes multiple sensors.

Budget pick

Though this model has the fewest features, setup takes seconds, its performance is fast for a Wi-Fi–based detector, and it sports an alarm that hits fire-alarm-like volume levels.

Compatibility: Amazon Alexa (Skill), Google Home

The Kidde Water Leak + Freeze Detector doesn’t cover much aside from the basics: Its smart-home support is barebones, and it has only two sensor probes, in contrast to competitors that have an array of top- and bottom-mounted probes. Still, this Kidde model was a decently quick performer throughout our testing; it also has one of the loudest alarms among the models we tested, and it typically costs less than $30, no additional hardware necessary. We do have concerns about the company’s response to our privacy and security questions, which left a lot unanswered.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Eric Chiu is a service journalist who covers subjects including internet providers, smart-home tech, and home appliances. He has also reviewed smart sensors for Wirecutter, and his work has appeared in outlets such as CableTV.com, Top Ten Reviews, and The Awl.

If you have ever discovered surprise cabinet damage underneath a dripping sink or have a utility room full of flood-prone sump pumps, appliances, and drains, you may want to invest in one or several smart leak detectors. These devices keep an eye on the places you can’t check daily and help you catch small drips before they become catastrophic water damage.

Water-leak detectors are typically battery-powered, puck-sized devices that variously set off an alarm or send a smartphone alert if water comes into contact with them. You can place them discreetly near leak-prone equipment, such as a water heater or dishwasher, so that you are quickly notified in the event of a problem and can take preventive action. Some models can work with accessory cables that also detect water, making it easier for you to monitor a greater area.

Two of the smart leak detectors that we tested to find the best, set on a surface showing water splash marks.
Smart leak detectors are generally puck shaped. These two models are battery-powered. While the YoLink detector (left) requires the use of a hub, the Kidde model (right) does not. Photo: Marki Williams

Water-leak sensors don’t require much technical know-how to set up and use. Most of our picks simply require you to install the manufacturer’s mobile app and scan a QR code or put in your network’s Wi-Fi credentials to get them online. You can tie some sensor models to other smart-home devices for more advanced responses: For example, you might have a leak sensor trigger an alert message that transmits to multiple smart speakers, smart lighting, or sirens, or you might have a sump pump or wet vac that cleans up a spill.

Some detectors require the use of an additional device, called a hub, that connects the detector to your home network and the internet. For instance, our top pick, from D-Link, comes with a hub, while the YoLink-branded hub for our runner-up is an extra purchase. Although hubs increase the up-front cost for a leak sensor, they typically add features such as better notification systems, a wider wireless range, smart-home integrations, or battery-life indicators. You can also purchase other door, temperature, and motion smart-home sensors from these companies for additional coverage. For this guide, we’ve tested a mix of standalone sensors and sensors that require a hub.

One thing that leak detectors can’t do is actually prevent water damage—like smoke detectors, they function only as alarms. A more comprehensive option may be to get a smart water-shutoff valve, which detects plumbing leaks or freezing pipes and then can physically shut off your home’s water-supply line. Such controllers are much pricier and more difficult to install than the detectors in this guide.

Home-security system manufacturers also have their own water-leak detectors, but they have mixed smart-home support, require you to purchase additional security hardware, and generally keep notifications within their own app ecosystem. This guide focuses on standalone sensors; check out our best home security system guide to learn more about those competitors.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Several different smart leak-sensors, shown in a group.
A look at a few of the smart leak sensors we’ve tested. Photo: Rachel Cericola

For this guide update, we retested our previous top picks while also looking for newer models. We prioritized the following criteria during our initial research process:

  • compatibility with smart-home platforms such as Amazon Alexa, Apple Home, and Google Home or support for email, phone, and push notifications
  • the ability to send a notification if the sensor goes offline
  • an alarm integrated in the sensor or hub
  • good owner-review ratings
  • extended customer support and end-of-life guarantees

For this update, we evaluated 20 sensors and tested 14 models in a one-story, 1,000-square-foot home. During our testing, we compared sensors on factors including price, smart-home support, ease of setup, product-support guarantees, and the durability of the hardware.

We also ran each sensor through a variety of stress tests, including:

  • measuring sensor response time using a plate filled with an eighth of an inch of water
  • timing the sensor response at close range to a hub or Wi-Fi router and at 30 feet away
  • measuring the alarm’s peak volume, using a decibel meter, from 6 feet away at ear level for sensors with integrated alarms
  • noting the sensor’s ability to detect leaks on uneven surfaces such as an unfinished basement floor and drain cover
The Kidde Water Leak + Freeze Detector, our budget pick for the best smart leak detector.
Photo: Marki Williams

Budget pick

Though this model has the fewest features, setup takes seconds, its performance is fast for a Wi-Fi–based detector, and it sports an alarm that hits fire-alarm-like volume levels.

Compatibility: Amazon Alexa (Skill only), Google Home

The Kidde Water Leak + Freeze Detector doesn’t do much beyond the basics, but it covers those basics exceptionally well. If you want an affordable water-leak detector that performs effectively and doesn’t require a hub, it’s a great option.

One troubling concern with Kidde is that its parent company, Carrier, refused to answer our routine and specific questions related to customer-data privacy and security and referred us to the company’s privacy policy. The company does say that it shares and sells user information and data collected by its devices and apps, so we strongly advise anyone buying a Kidde product to contact the company and opt out of data sharing before setting up and using any Kidde or Carrier device.

It’s reassuringly loud. The Kidde sensor’s most notable strength is its eardrum-piercing alarm. In our testing the alarm surpassed Kidde’s advertised 85 decibels, as it hit a whopping 96-decibel peak. That means members of your household don’t have to rely on a smartphone app to receive a notification of a leak, and the alarm will be audible whether it’s in a second-floor bathroom or basement equipment room.

It has a straightforward design. Kidde is best known for its smoke alarms, and the Water Leak + Freeze Detector borrows more than a few design cues from the company’s main product line. At 3.25 by 1.25 inches, the puck-like Kidde leak sensor looks like a mini smoke alarm.

This model is slightly taller than other leak detectors we tested, which generally measured no more than an inch tall, so fitting this sensor in tight areas such as underneath an appliance is tougher. But with its plain white exterior, it easily blends into laundry rooms or bathrooms.

The Kidde Water Leak + Freeze Detector nestled under a sink among various cleaners, cords, and pipes.
We measured the Kidde sensor’s siren at 85 dB, which is very loud—it’s readily audible from a distance. Photo: Marki Williams

It provides basic leak-detection coverage. Whereas our top-rated leak detectors feature an array of detection probes, this model has just two bottom-mounted probes. Around the size of ball bearings, the probes cover more ground than pins, but they’re also widely spaced out, with a gaping 1.9 inches between them. Competing sensors, in contrast, generally have their probe pairs only millimeters apart from each other to ensure that they don’t miss a water leak.

This sensor may struggle in areas such as a utility room with an unfinished floor, where water may not pool evenly, since water must contact both probes simultaneously to trigger an alarm. Careful detector placement is essential—if you’re using this sensor under a water heater or sink, you might want to consider placing it in a plastic pan to ensure that a sufficient amount of water collects in order for it to trigger.

It’s smart about notifications. Kidde’s mobile app is the primary way to manage this sensor. In our tests, setup was extremely easy, as we simply had to scan a QR code on the detector and go through a brief installation wizard; the app offers a bundle of functions, too. It relies on Wi-Fi to send leak alerts, but we didn’t notice a meaningful lag— it was only seconds slower than competitors during our testing.

Within the app, you can tie the detector to a home address, add family members to your notification group, and set notifications by push, text, or email. The app will also send you alerts when the battery life gets low, when the device goes offline for more than 12 hours, and when temperatures drop below 37 degrees Fahrenheit, which is when pipes are at risk of freezing and bursting.

It isn’t widely compatible. Kidde’s smart-home support doesn’t measure up to the app’s functionality. Although technically this sensor is compatible with Amazon Alexa and Google Home, its Alexa support is limited to a poorly reviewed Alexa Skill. And as with other leak detectors with Google Home support, you can get leak-status updates, but you can’t create Google Automations using the Kidde system. You can get leak voice notifications with the Kidde sensor through a Google speaker, but in our tests it was slower in this regard than other leak detectors—although the push notification from Kidde’s app came within seconds, around 13 seconds passed before the leak alert reached our Google speaker.

Privacy and security snapshot

  • Kidde’s parent company, Carrier, refused to specifically answer our security and privacy questionnaire, instead referring us to the company’s privacy statement, which we found lacked the sorts of details that competing companies routinely provide.
  • Carrier does acknowledge that it collects personal information and usage data, which it uses internally and also may share with or sell to third parties, including insurance companies, data-analytics companies, property-management companies, and rental-property booking sites.
  • Before you use a Kidde device, we strongly recommend that you opt out of sharing your personal information and having any of your personal data shared. You can do so by sending an email request stating that you don’t want your usage and personal information and device data shared with or sold to third parties.

Review Kidde’s privacy statement for more information.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

If you need coverage for multiple rooms: Govee’s Water Leak Detector 2 includes a handful of upgrades over the Govee WiFi Water Sensor, such as a revamped design and LoRa long-range wireless support. A solid performer throughout our testing, the Water Leak Detector 2 ran neck-and-neck with the YoLink Water Leak Sensor 4, as both models have top- and bottom-mounted probes, loud alarms, Alexa support, and quick response times.

YoLink’s sensors ultimately won out due to factors such as YoLink’s support for offline notifications and cleaner app layout. But Govee also sells the Water Leak Detector 2 in a convenient four- or six-sensor bundle that includes Govee’s hub device, while YoLink’s package options top out at a four-sensor bundle.

If you need a slim detector to fit into a tight spot: The Moen Smart Leak Detector and Aqara Water Leak Sensor are both solid models, though a slight step behind our top picks. The Moen model, a previous pick, lacks smart-home automation support, while the Aqara sensor has only two sensor probes for water detection and requires use of an Aqara hub.

Both devices are notably thin: The Aqara model is only 0.59 inch tall, while the Moen detector’s remote sensor disc is 0.26 inch thick, easily slim enough to sit under a refrigerator or dishwasher. The Aqara model is one of the few water sensors with Apple Home support, while Moen’s sensor disc (which plugs into the Moen detector via a 3.5 mm cable) is extendable by up to 18 feet if you purchase Moen’s 6-foot leak-sensor extension cables. As with D-Link’s sensor kit, the entire Moen cable can detect water leaks, which makes it potentially more effective.

If you have a lot of home water equipment and an advanced smart home: The Proteus Aquo isn’t an especially elegant leak detector. Among its quirks, it forces you to use a web browser to manage the sensor, it has to be plugged into a wall outlet, its smart-home integration (Amazon Alexa, Google Home, and IFTTT) is a clunky multistep process, and it lacks a smartphone app.

The Aquo quickly sent leak and offline notifications in our testing, its alarm sounded at 83 decibels at distance, and it sports a dizzying array of customizable buzzer, email, and phone notification options. (However, voice calls, direct texts, and WhatsApp notifications are billed on a per-notification basis.) You can also customize your Aquo with up to five sensors, and Proteus sells puck, cable-length, and sump-pump sensors for even more coverage options.

The Aquo’s higher-end price and customization options likely make it overpowered for most smart homes, but if you’re an advanced user seeking to integrate your home’s water system into your smart home, the Aquo’s extra horsepower could make it a great fit for you.

IKEA has announced new sensors coming later this year, including the Badring Water Leakage Sensor, which has a built-in siren and works with or without a smart hub.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

In our previous testing and guide updates, we’ve ranked a number of sensors behind our picks because of some combination of design flaws, feature deficiencies, and performance gaps.

This article was edited by Jon Chase and Grant Clauser.

Meet your guide

Eric Chiu

Eric Chiu is a service journalist who covers subjects including internet providers, smart-home tech, and home appliances. His work has appeared in outlets such as CableTV.com, Top Ten Reviews, and The Awl.

Further reading

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Edit
Dismiss